Justifying Right and Wrong

Starting point of any story is it’s beginning, that’s normal human progress, then gradually with time this beginning slowly metamorphose into the body of the story; the part which builds the setting for the climax (excuse the pun) then we reach the conclusion (or the pun), well people are a lot more capable of drawing up a conclusion if you know what I mean and others tend to fade away, but that’s beside the point.

The point I’m trying to make is this is all normal human progress (if you thought it was something else then clearly your mind is far from clean) and anything contrary to this is not normal right?...I don’t know…Is everything that clear cut, is anything clear cut to begin with, I mean not everything follows the normal human progression, it all depends on the situation and the individual in question... you do agree with me right? This structured existence so to speak, is nothing but a fictitious scale used to measure our lives.

Everyone’s view is subjective in the same way as everyone’s life is subjective to the confines of their capacities and so on. But exactly how different are we? Can you have an ending without a beginning; can your life begin with a climax and end with an introduction? I can’t answer these questions infact I doubt anyone can you would probably all come up with different answers…that doesn’t really matter. What matters is how you justify your view, if you can reasonably justify whatever answer you come up with (not just for this question, but life in general) without using generalization or personal views and instead engaging the outlet of your rationality then surely you are right regardless of the consequences and motives of your actions

However that is not to say Hitler was right in killing Jews e.t.c if he could reasonably justify his actions because there are universal rights and wrongs. Things we all accept as right or wrong, these transcend culture, religion and other subjective factors they are derived purely from reason and normal human experience. “Do not kill” because we value human life and hold it as something sacred.

But like everything else this too is limited by other factors. For example do not kill unless your life is under threat. There is no clear cut moral solution to such situations, infact there probably isn’t any right way to do things, all we can do is really on the outlet of our reason.